<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Recent changes to 74: Regression Tests for Head and Maintenance Branches</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/dacapobench/bugs/74/" rel="alternate"/><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/dacapobench/bugs/74/feed.atom" rel="self"/><id>https://sourceforge.net/p/dacapobench/bugs/74/</id><updated>2010-03-26T04:05:11Z</updated><subtitle>Recent changes to 74: Regression Tests for Head and Maintenance Branches</subtitle><entry><title>Regression Tests for Head and Maintenance Branches</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/dacapobench/bugs/74/" rel="alternate"/><published>2010-03-26T04:05:11Z</published><updated>2010-03-26T04:05:11Z</updated><author><name>John N Zigman</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/jzigman/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net94afd4072b9efbe4653cfdc15b9dae1366e0782f</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bug fixes and updates purely for a maintenance release should be committed to a separate maintenance branch (specific to the release) and development should be conducted on the trunk/default branch.  This being the case then we should have a regressions tests conducted on the head of the development branch and separate regression tests conducted on the head of the maintenance branch.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry></feed>