https://sourceforge.net/p/freeimage/feature-requests/55/2017-07-19T20:15:52.094000ZRecent changes to 55: Switch to Github ? XD2017-07-19T20:15:52.094000Z2017-07-19T20:15:52.094000ZTransporterhttps://sourceforge.net/u/transporter/https://sourceforge.net11b7efec817572036485804876d34cabd4a24a32

<div class="markdown_content"><p><a href="https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/documentation/CVS/">https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/documentation/CVS/</a></p> <blockquote> <p>We recommend that projects upgrade to a more modern SCM, like Subversion, rather than using CVS. CVS has limitations which newer SCM solutions have been designed to overcome.</p> </blockquote></div>

2017-07-16T18:39:32.719000Z2017-07-16T18:39:32.719000ZTransporterhttps://sourceforge.net/u/transporter/https://sourceforge.net026cf82fd5b426baffdad9d81ba12041be392dd0

<div class="markdown_content"><p>See <a href="https://sourceforge.net/p/freeimage/discussion/36111/thread/f2fae857/">https://sourceforge.net/p/freeimage/discussion/36111/thread/f2fae857/</a> for a discussion about GitHub. It would be nice to switch from CVS to a modern SCM system. It's possible to use Subversion, Git or Mercurial on Sourceforge. Btw, Sourceforge dropped CVS support for new projects. There is no active development on CVS and a lot of features are missing. From my point of view CVS is a real pain, because there is no working proxy support on Windows (I'm sitting behind a proxy). I don't care about the location of the source code (GitHub or Sourceforge) but please change to a modern system!</p> <p>Regards,<br/> Transporter</p></div>

2016-02-17T06:59:11.634000Z2016-02-17T06:59:11.634000ZDaniel Rosserhttps://sourceforge.net/u/danoli3/https://sourceforge.net6fcbcea8374e56420402c1ef67ebefc554fd1592

<div class="markdown_content"><p>This would be an amazing feature... just saying. </p> <p>I know you guys have been on Source Forge for a long time... when do you guys want to make the switch though?</p></div>