https://sourceforge.net/p/gellish/discussion/Recent posts to DiscussionenSat, 10 Dec 2016 19:16:08 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/gellish/discussion/89286/thread/88171e0e/<div class="markdown_content"><p>Luke,<br/> Sorry, I did not verify the discussions since long.</p> <p>An example of a technical standard that is rewritten using Gellish is the European standard EN 16323 - Waste Water Terminology. The Gellish version of it provides computer interpretable waste water terms and definitions in (formal) English, French and German.<br/> All the concepts of the standard are also included in the Gellish Taxonomic Dictionary.<br/> Various other ISO and IEC terminology and coding standards are included in the Gellish Taxonomic Dictionary, including some detailed coding standards.</p></div>Andries van RenssenSat, 10 Dec 2016 19:16:08 -0000https://sourceforge.netaf439e9633add8bb21fe0c9b52cd0023f35f0320https://sourceforge.net/p/gellish/discussion/89286/thread/88171e0e/<div class="markdown_content"><p>Are there any examples of a technical standard, code, or specification being written with the help of Gellish?</p> <p>Technical standards, such as those created by ISO, ASTM, and others have ambigious text, redundancy, and sometimes messy organization and verbiage causing difficulty to understand. I'm wondering if Gellish could be used to create a minimal and less ambiguous standard that is human readable, but I'm hesitant to take on this task without a similar example to derive a process from.</p></div>Luke WWed, 25 Mar 2015 20:32:43 -0000https://sourceforge.netaf7cf3855fd92c4422a96075ebaa7cc2812637e8