<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to feature-requests</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/mp3gain/feature-requests/</link><description>Recent changes to feature-requests</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mp3gain/feature-requests/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 08:59:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mp3gain/feature-requests/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>#49 New CPU technology</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/mp3gain/feature-requests/49/?limit=25#6486</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;You'd probably find a large market for a 64-bit multi-threading mp3Gain app.  When can we expect an .exe release?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alain (Speedy) Charlebois</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 08:59:35 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net33f4698a2c6cecfed5309c34a305fdd356113f23</guid></item><item><title>#49 New CPU technology</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/mp3gain/feature-requests/49/?limit=25#28d3</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hmm. I just posted a rebuild of the whole project into Visual Studio 2026. It is now 64-bit and fully Unicode. I probably could add multi-threading...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">William Harvey</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 14:43:05 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net6f7d9a40449a420a20e410e24b0e869a0547380b</guid></item><item><title>#49 New CPU technology</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/mp3gain/feature-requests/49/?limit=25#091b/28a8</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sorry, it's more like "in 13 years I've had time to forget most of the code" :)&lt;br/&gt;
I have no plans for any further changes, especially not changes that would require fundamental structural changes like multithreading.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Glen Sawyer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 18:18:34 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net3ede9e6b5a6dbf5129f73d84b39959b47f462356</guid></item><item><title>#49 New CPU technology</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/mp3gain/feature-requests/49/?limit=25#091b</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Same question was asked in 2011... Guess the answer was no then since it hasn't happened yet but surely in 13 years you've had time to rethink that....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alain (Speedy) Charlebois</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 01:39:53 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net49f3f027294d30f08b3def23dc75dec9ddd4a223</guid></item><item><title>New CPU technology</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/mp3gain/feature-requests/49/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is there a chance that we will see mp3Gain take advantage of multi-core CPU technology in the near future?  Would save oodles of time on large batch jobs...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alain (Speedy) Charlebois</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2024 07:28:50 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net781dddd1293913fe1062ce1e88610864491e1772</guid></item><item><title>Option to speed up</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/mp3gain/feature-requests/48/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;An option would be great to speed  up the analysis,&lt;br/&gt;
like 2x: only analyse half the file (either till middle, or randomly sample half-length)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sometimes it can take minutes to analyse, by understanding the compromise it could be speed up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrx23dot</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2022 14:51:01 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net24c3125d7e92b7971425ae3e9f88c2715872f086</guid></item><item><title>#40 Remove or update ReplayGain info</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/mp3gain/feature-requests/40/?limit=25#ff4f</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Old problem but here is a potential solution...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let's say you normalized with -a -d 4 -c&lt;br/&gt;
The replaygain values will be off by -4dB since they are modeled around 89dB and you normalized to 93dB. Replaygain will always try to lower the volume to 89dB. If you adjust the replaygain values by subtracting the 4dB then you must add that 4dB back when loading the files the next time. If you don't, mp3gain will assume the current values are based on 89dB. If you do the same -a -d 4 -c then it will raise the volume since it thinks they are at 89dB currently.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How will mp3gain know to add back the 4dB the next time. You create a new tag and put a value of 93.0. This give you a normalized reference point. &lt;br/&gt;
Load the file - if the dBlevel_tag exists then adjust the replaygain values back to their original value by doing...&lt;br/&gt;
x = (replaygain_album_gain - (dBlevel_tag - 89))&lt;br/&gt;
y = (replaygain_track_gain - (dBlevel_tag - 89))&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You must restore the original replaygain values before any new calculations are done.&lt;br/&gt;
If you use a previous version of mp3gain later then you must use -s r to force recalculation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My current aacgain mod sets a "normalization_level_dB" tag (currently for aac files only) and sets it to "93.0" if that's what I normalized to.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you use -m &lt;i&gt; then you have to adjust the dBlevel tag accordingly. If you use -g &lt;i&gt; later then you would have to read the existing normalization_level_dB and adjust it's value by adding (&lt;i&gt; x 1.5) &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dean Laforet</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 04:46:55 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.nete8b313e2d7f6e4dbb1bdc018e484aa4916b2ef85</guid></item><item><title>#47 Does the MP3gain program work for Windows 10  64 bits?</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/mp3gain/feature-requests/47/?limit=25#de86</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Glen Sawyer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2018 23:03:50 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net48f3611271884632b08531b0f1fe182ec420bb2f</guid></item><item><title>Does the MP3gain program work for Windows 10  64 bits?</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/mp3gain/feature-requests/47/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Does the MP3gain program work for Windows 10  64 bits?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">D G B</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 23:29:21 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netbd11e1196e1c42f70394e30eca60ca2726096e81</guid></item><item><title>Update the homepage</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/mp3gain/feature-requests/46/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://mp3gain.sourceforge.net"&gt;http://mp3gain.sourceforge.net&lt;/a&gt; still contains links to the historical 1.5.2r2 and every security researcher seems to be using that as target, producing bogus CVEs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Luigi Baldoni</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 13:05:17 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net5a778c9ad510149d19c70e0f3e287664aaa3ff87</guid></item></channel></rss>