<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Recent changes to feature-requests</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/pslib/feature-requests/" rel="alternate"/><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/pslib/feature-requests/feed.atom" rel="self"/><id>https://sourceforge.net/p/pslib/feature-requests/</id><updated>2013-03-25T19:49:33Z</updated><subtitle>Recent changes to feature-requests</subtitle><entry><title>Use autoconf 2.69</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/pslib/feature-requests/2/" rel="alternate"/><published>2013-03-25T19:49:33Z</published><updated>2013-03-25T19:49:33Z</updated><author><name>Orion Poplawski</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/opoplawski/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.nete66c5fd26685b65e47e538ff4764ef7fa0f24393</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Support for the ARM 64 bit CPU architecture (aarch64) was introduced in &lt;br /&gt;
autoconf 2.69.  pslib appears to use an earlier version of &lt;br /&gt;
autoconf, preventing its being built with having to re-run autoconf.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>LIcensing</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/pslib/feature-requests/1/" rel="alternate"/><published>2011-11-16T16:42:57Z</published><updated>2011-11-16T16:42:57Z</updated><author><name>Orion Poplawski</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/opoplawski/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net2aaa4c46b6b5e33286f59b6165e5da3852511bb8</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Most of the source in pslib is licensed under the LGPL version 2, but the COPYING file is an old copy of the GPLv2 license with the old FSF address.  Could you instead include a copy of the latest LGPLv2 license? &lt;a href="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.1.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.1.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, some code is licensed under the MPL v 1.0 and MIT license.  You probably should make a note of that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry></feed>