What about used memory of such nice program ?
Even it is on "back" - it use 39MB of RAM (win'xp sp3)
Previous version used almost 25 and so on...
Can be issued light version, w/o design options or something like that ?
Just a thought :)
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I have had a look at this - the jump in memory use between the two versions is probably due the fact that have started using an externall DLL for file processing ( FileHelpers.dll ), which has been done in preparation for supporting portable versions of PuTTY.
However , the memory reported in Task Manager can be a bit misleading. The following article is worth a read if you are interested:
Unfortunately the .NET runtime doesn't give me much control over this ( but I have run PSM through a .NET profiler to check I'm not doing anything silly ). As for a light version , I don't believe that many people would want to swap functionality for a reduced memory footprint, so I don't think I will investigate that option.
Hope that helps
Kind Regards
David
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
What about used memory of such nice program ?
Even it is on "back" - it use 39MB of RAM (win'xp sp3)
Previous version used almost 25 and so on...
Can be issued light version, w/o design options or something like that ?
Just a thought :)
Hi,
I have had a look at this - the jump in memory use between the two versions is probably due the fact that have started using an externall DLL for file processing ( FileHelpers.dll ), which has been done in preparation for supporting portable versions of PuTTY.
However , the memory reported in Task Manager can be a bit misleading. The following article is worth a read if you are interested:
http://www.itwriting.com/dotnetmem.php
Unfortunately the .NET runtime doesn't give me much control over this ( but I have run PSM through a .NET profiler to check I'm not doing anything silly ). As for a light version , I don't believe that many people would want to swap functionality for a reduced memory footprint, so I don't think I will investigate that option.
Hope that helps
Kind Regards
David